Pros And Cons Of Judicial Review :: Government Judicial Review Essays

Pros and Cons of Judicial brush upJudicial Review is the spring given to overbearing court justices in which a referee has the power to reason whether a law is unconstitutional or not. head wordJustice John Marshall initiated the overbearing Courts right to translate the composition in 1803 following the case of Marbury Vs. Madison, in which hedeclared the Supreme Court as the sole interpreters of Constitutional law. Thisis one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the coupled States. ManyHistorical thinkers would find some fuss in imagining a governing set upto limit the power of itself,but others would argue that this form of governmentbest works for the people, and not against them. The intervention of theConstitution by the Supreme Court as a spiritedness document that is able to betranslated incompatiblely over time for the hefty of the people has as many skepticsas it does supporters. But, if we do not intromit the Supreme Court to translatethe Constitution who then, should the people chose to do much(prenominal) an important job.If we were to look back at the ideas and thoughts of some of thegreatest policy-making thinkers of our time, we would find that individuals such asPlato, Niccolo Machiavelli, and John Locke, would share extremely differentviews as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,would be successful in their ideal government situations. star of the earliest political philosophers Plato, would find ourpresent day governmental setup of the Supreme Court to be the ideal group todeal with the United States situation. Plato felt that government should be runby enlightened philosopher kings, that would get hold for the good of the people,and not themselves. We today see the Supreme Court as a collection of the mostenlightened thinkers of our day. They are chosen to curb moral decisions aboutlaws made by others in our society, and decide whether or not the laws we makeare in the best interest o f our area as a whole. Plato knew that within anypolitical State their would be corruption, to stop the corruption Plato feltthat the philosopher kings would best rule because they would not panderthemselves in a corrupt society. They only believed in the truth, and justicethat government is supposed to protect its people with.Although Plato would not totally agree with the egalitarian structure ofour government, I believe that he would chose for our society, a state that isgovern by a similar group to that of our Supreme Court because, the members of