Leadership In Julius Ceasar Essay -- William Shakespeare

In Shakespe atomic number 18s tragedy Julius Caesar, the use of various leaders prevails an important role in the plot, showing vividly how steady personalities conflict. This is the case with Brutus and Cassius, the deuce leaders among the several conspirators. The story of Julius Caesar is set in ancient Rome during a time when Julius Caesar is to become king. This, however, angers Cassius, a nobleman, and he plots with Brutus and others to kill him before he becomes king. They do just that, justifying their momentions by aspect Caesar was too ambitious and would realize gone insane with power. This backfires with the Roman citizens by and by an emotional speech by lollipop Antony, Caesars right extend man. This forces the conspirators to flee Rome and go to war with Antony and eventually take their avow lives. Because of their massive leadership qualities, Brutus and Cassius take the leader roles among the conspirators. Nevertheless, they at multiplication do argue over the course of action. Though Brutus and Cassius are both corresponding in that they are great leaders, their differences in character are slavish in determining the conclusion of the play.Despite their differences, Brutus and Cassius have similar traits that stock in rise to great leaders. Both Brutus and Cassius are noble, intelligent men. They usually have good intentions and understand the situation they are in. This is why they both combine to go along with the conspiracy to kill Caesar. The two also equal to think out and plan their actions. They do this two significant times in the play. When the two plan Caesars assassination and during the planning of the terminal move for Brutus and Cassius army. When the assassination is developing, Cassius thinks to kill Antony as well as Caesar saying, Mark Antony, so well beloved of Caesar, Should outlive Caesar. We shall find of him A knowing contriver and you know his means, If he improve them, may well compass so far As to annoy us all. Which to prevent, Let Antony and Caesar fall together (2.1.157-162). Brutus, however, responds with his own reasoning, Our course will seen too bloody, Caius Cassius, To cut the compass point off and then hack at the limbs, Like wrath in death and envy afterwards For Antony is but a limb of Caesar (2.1.163-166). They two are also self reliant and self-dependent. They can think and act for themselves as they should any great man says Cassius to Brutus, Me... ...derable differences in trust and inscription are the ultimate factors that influence the conclusion of the play. Both of these characters have great qualities such as intelligence, self-dependence, and reasoning ability that make them excellent leaders. It, however, is their differences that control the end result of the conspiracy. The single most outstanding decision of the play was when the conspirators resolved not to kill Antony along with Caesar. Brutus overwhelming trust of Antony take him to believe Antony was not going to be a problem. There are many implications of leadership as seen in Julius Caesar. Those who tend to exhibit starchy leadership characteristics will have much more impact on those who tend to stand back and fall into the crowd, even if the decisions being do are illogical. When two pie-eyed leaders interact, there usually is a disagreement on the course of action, which can be harmful for the group. The strong characters of Brutus and Cassius, and the weaker conspirators, prove both these conclusions. Works CitedShakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Houghton Mifflin Company. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston, 1994.