The Impact of the History of the Youth Justice System on Current Essay

The Impact of the History of the offspring nicety System on Current Policy and Practice - Essay ExampleThis outcome represents 20 percent of the 1.4 million offences committed in that year. These figures have been an alarming and the subject on the Youth arbitrator Systems remains to be in scrutiny by the eyes of many.There was an escalation of juvenility wrongdoers in the unite Kingdom during the early 1990s. Thus, the Labour party reacted to the situation and produced the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 which created the Youth Justice Board (YJB) and Youth Offending Teams (YOT).According to Pearson (1898), the general impression running through the pages of youth crimes was a riot of impunity, irresponsible parents, working m some others and lax discipline in schools, with magistrates and police force believing themselves to be ineffective before a rising tide of mischief and violence-particularly the recent serious increase in ruffianism among metropolis youths.It is this rec ent drive to administer evaluator locally that highlights the historical comparisons in the methods used to tackle youth offending. Whether it is local authorities issuing antisocial behaviour orders, community courts being created to administer penalties or police publicising the names and faces of young offenders, justice is increasingly administered closer to home (Hayes 2008). The Youth Justice Board (YJB)This is an executive director non-departmental public body nether the joint governance of the Ministry of Justice and the Department for Children, Schools and Families which aims is to prevent offending among under 18-years-old and it delivers this by setting standards and monitoring performance, promoting good practice and making grants available to local authorities and other bodies. The YJB also manages the juvenile secure estate including arranging placements for sentenced young people. TheYJB has set up a number of diversionary schemes to engage with young people, increa se their knowledge and deter them from offending. (Youth Justice Board 2008)This body established the Youth Justice System (Table 1) which serves as the systems summary and guide.Table 1. Steps through the youth justice systemYouth Justice SystemPersons InvolvedPreventionYOT, LEA,Social Services, PolicePre-courtPolice,YOT,Local billet courtPolice,YOT,CPSPolice,YOT, CPS,Solicitor,Youth CourtYOT,Solicitor,CPS,Youth Court /Crown CourtYouth Court /Crown CourtYOT,CustodyYOT = youth offending teams LEA = local educating authority CPS = spinning top prosecution service.Source Youth Justice System (2008)The Cautioning Plus digestCautioning plus is defined as a form of cautioning-official warning by the police-which included voluntary participation by the young offender in a preventative programme. One component of the Youth Justice Board is the Cautioning Plus Project (Dawson 2001) which provides direct services, such as counselling, befriending, information, advocacy, holistic welfare, and early crisis intervention to challenge cycles of drug use and crime. With this project, theres a network among the youth offenders with a combined focus among these individuals.PunishmentsBased from